Fitting 33's on the AC lift
#22
Posted 14 November 2009 - 10:59 AM
#23
Posted 14 November 2009 - 12:10 PM
This post has been edited by GoPathyGo: 14 November 2009 - 12:11 PM
#24
Posted 14 November 2009 - 01:07 PM
#25
Posted 15 November 2009 - 10:54 PM
GoPathyGo, on 03 November 2009 - 05:50 PM, said:
Of course, Alex probably has some superultrawonder thing going on that mere mortals couldn't understand.
Well, here is the issue with your setup- you had a rediculous amount of offset on your wheels, like 3.2 or whatever, By using the stock wheels, they can tuck in the back, and up front, the backspace will be about the same as your wheels were with the spacer. But the front doesnt flex anyways so there is no problem there.

This post has been edited by 01silvapathy: 15 November 2009 - 10:55 PM
#27
Posted 16 November 2009 - 09:14 AM
GoPathyGo, on 16 November 2009 - 06:19 AM, said:
Not in the rear, the rear wheels will have the stock bs and since the rear flexes more it can tuck more easily vs a higher offset wheel. There is no need for an offsset wheel in the back. Up front is where the issue is, with the struts and yes up front will be about the same as the offset wheels, but that doesnt matter much because the front doesnt flex for sh!t
#28
Posted 16 November 2009 - 01:54 PM
Not sure I agree the front doesn't "flex for @!*%". (That sounds like AlexRex garbage. Are you channeling him now ?
#29
Posted Yesterday, 04:40 PM
I ended up using 90's Pajero alloys with 120mm backspace in 15" as I had already got the tyres. BUT
I also had to change wheel nuts as the Pajero and Pathy Mag wheel nuts were not only different thread (M12 1.25 for Pathy and M12 1.5 for Pajero) they were also slightly different diameter holes in the wheels and the Pathy nuts were a little loose.
I am happy with them, after a serious weekend away, I didn't hear them scrape at all.
I like to keep the flares and inner guard plastic stuff stock.
The finished product

Nick
#30
Posted Yesterday, 05:21 PM

Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote